I'm just not sure it would be worth it for my situation and what I'm looking for. Granted, a lot of folks say it has great tone, so the trade off is worth it. The only thing that makes me hesitant about it is that it's more expensive than the others and seems to have less options/versatility. I've seen the Mustang come up quite a bit in these type of discussions/comparisons. With the Zoom controlling my effects, I'm looking to simplify the amp and get one really nice base tone to work from. I spent some time setting up patches and such on the Vypyr, but I ended up using only a few of the included effects. I now use a Zoom G5 for most all of my effects, so onboard effects don't matter to me. Also, the newer Orange Crush combos sound amazing for a solid state amp. I'm now looking at low wattage tube combos, like the Blackstar HT20 and HT40. Specifically, it seems to have some sort of noise gate that has gotten annoying when holding notes out and coaxing feedback from them. I've found that while the Vypyr sounds good, it's missing some of the qualities I'm looking for in an amp. That said, I'm now looking for somethign else. I went with the Vypyr over the Cube for built-in effects. I went with the Vypyr over the Mustang for cost. I liked the tone of the Vypyr better than the Spider. Honestly, the Roland sounded the second best. The Mustang sounded the best, hands down. I played a Line 6 Spider, Roland Cube and a Mustang before buying the Vypyr. Changing the effect settings, delay and reverb on the amp itself can be a little tedious. It does a good job of modeling tube tones and the reverb is pleasing. The amp sounds good, especially for clean tones that I put pedals in front of.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |